Proflie Judgeing

I believe that when i judge is getting ready to make a decision they have to stand by what they asked for, but also at the same time need to see the contenders points of view, as to where they came from. In a way sometimes, its as simple as the example question; what is a hero and what makes them a hero. This question and be answered no a mever ending amount of ways, but if i was a judge there would be certain points that they would need to hit to get points in answering the question. Is it a personal hero, or a public on, and explain in depth why they chose this certain individual as a hero. Yet this is me and that is one example where judgeing can get hard and in a way complicated, because in the end no one is wrong when it comes to their answer.

If I were to be judgeing the final portfolio, i would keeping an eye on the topic they chose and how they talked about it in depth or in general, how personal they got, and if the paper has a peronsality in it, that shows to me as a reader. Also grammer, I mean after all this is an english assignment, and some things come first. Spell check is needed, contractions and not used in proper english writing, and using correct capitalization, and also overall simple spelling. If puncation is correct, or if its needs to be added, changed, or just deleted over all. When citing other documents; this needs to be done correctly, and as often as you use their writings. Not citing seems as though you are stealing their work and calling it your own. Yet to me, if they do it wrong, but its not a huge mistake its not major points off, they are giving the credit, but maybe they just did not have the exact order in the parenthesis's. Also are the texts that they are using realiable, are they factual, or is if wikipedia, they need to be using creaditable sources. Another point in judging is in the body of the paper, if their introduction and conclusion is strong, if it reels me into really wanting to read this paper and see their opinions. The thesis statement, is it strong, or weak, is it on topic of way off topic. Their conclusion, does it sumerize the paper well and completely, or does it still leave you with loose ends and questions. These are the points in the portfolio that I would be most looking for when it comes to judgeing them. Yet I would make sure that I also see where the writer is coming from in this paper.