Friday, December 18, 2009
weekly blog
Monday, December 14, 2009
what I've Learned This Semester
Sunday, December 13, 2009
weekly blog
Friday, December 11, 2009
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Final blog
Weekly blog
Weekly blog
Course text essays
Politics of Writing
Citing Sources
Adding Quotes
My worst date
Portfolio
Interpretation
Revising my reflective essay
final blog
Real-final one!
Weekly Blog-16 (Final one!) :)
Weekly Blog-15
Weekly Blog-14
Weekly Blog-13
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
Final Portfolio's should:
1) Include 3 separate papers, each with their own works cited page (if needed)
2) NOT have your name listed in the header or on the folder. Use your student ID # in place of your name.
3) Have your ID #, section # (english 101.14), semester (Fall 09) and instructors name in the folder tab header for each paper
Your Welcome
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
weekly blog
Monday, December 7, 2009
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Weekly blog
Weekly blog
Weekly blog
weekly blog
Saturday, December 5, 2009
weekly blog
Weekly blog post
Weekly blog post
weekly blog post
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
weekly blog
make up #4
make up #3
make up #2
make up blog #1
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
Monday, November 30, 2009
weekly blog
weekly blog
Sunday, November 29, 2009
weekly...
weekly blog
Saturday, November 28, 2009
1) Im having a great Thanksgiving break
2) I revised my papers this morning and i think i found the "formula" to add qoute onto the bad date essay!
I qouted my friend in the stoy and elborated on how there point of view changed my may own. Im not complete sure if this was the goal at hand but its got to be close
Weekly Blog #15
Friday, November 27, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
weekly blog
weekly blog
Sunday, November 22, 2009
weekly blog
Saturday, November 21, 2009
HELPP
Heather
Friday, November 20, 2009
Weekly Blog #13
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Weekly Blog #12
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
weekly blog
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Weekly Blog-12
Weekly Blog-11
Weekly Blog-10
Weekly Blog-9
Weekly Blog-8
weekly Blog-7
Weekly Blog-6
weekly Blog-5
Weekly Blog-4
Weekly Blog-3
Weekly Blog-2
Weekly Blog-1
weekly blog
Monday, November 16, 2009
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blog
weekly blogs
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Reflection Essay
Many college students often work in groups on projects and papers. This is because it is proven to help them to get used to real world and learn to cope and work well with all different kinds of people. For example in English 101, students are asked to get in groups, choose three questions in which all have a common theme and each person write a paper answering the question. Then the students will collaborate there papers to answer a bigger question they think of that has to do with all three questions. The collaboration process seems to be somewhat tedious. It can take a while to come up just with ideas and titles then the writing process can take even longer.
I am in English 101 and asked to do the collaborative essay. The initial paper was not that difficult. The question I decided to answer was, “How can making up the truth be a positive thing?” and the two other questions in my group all had to do with what is true and what is not. When it came around to the collaboration process, it took quite a while to think of just the question which we decided was, “How does one’s recollection of an event shape what is true in history?” Once that was out of the way we had to decide what points in each of our own essays were strong and how we could use those points to help answer the bigger question. The rest of the paper consisted of us attempting to make the points flow and explanations strong enough so the paper was readable.
The way that we were able to find common ground worked out very nicely. We were able to brainstorm what we were doing and come up with the best way we thought we could write a collaborative essay. We understood what we needed to have in the essay to make it the easiest to follow without being the class. Our collaborative essay was made of all of our ideas and main points in our papers. We tried to be as detailed as we could without repeating what was in our three individual papers. We tried to come up with a title that would help readers get an understanding of what was going on in the entire essay. We also tried to think of words that would get our points across more effectively which we found made out paper a lot more entertaining than before and not as repetitive as it would have otherwise been.
As a group, we decided that the best way to help our readers fully comprehend our main points was to incorporate the facts from our paper that seemed to have to most value. We used details from essays and short stories in our class book, “The First Year Composition Reader.” Our group thought that with examples from a text, quotes and explanations we were able to put our point across. Our points were stated and we tried not to give too much away from each of our individual papers. The collaborative essay is explained well and fully.
There were some decisions we had to make that we knew could either make or break our essay. Some points we decided to change around a bit so that it would make more sense to the readers. One example of this is when were attempting to state how each person has their own different interpretation on an event. At first we had four or five different sentences in which when we read it out loud just did not prove the point we wanted it to make so we had to do a lot of revision while writing the paper. The whole decision process can result in making the paper a terribly under explained answer to a question that has to do with nothing, so we attempted to brainstorm as much as we could before we actually started writing. Our paper would have turned out completely different if we did not do this. We probably would not have explained anything as much and our paper would have been very choppy. When we sat down and started making these decisions we were unsure at first how detailed we should be. I feel that we were detailed enough for having to write an introduction essay, however after talking with our teacher, I realized we could have gone in to much more detail so that all points expressed in each of our individual papers would have been touched on and understood, instead of just the main points in each of our papers.
The paper we wrote as a group has a sense of worthiness when answering the question. It might not be a professionally written piece of work, but it does have points that are explained well. They probably could be a bit more developed but for a first draft of a paper it answers the question at hand and does a good job at it. The readers will be able to understand the answer to our main question, maybe without even reading it. The reader may say we could use a bit more, however overall it does answer the question and explains our main points with detail and example.
There were some parts of the process where we needed to remind each other what the main question actually was. There were parts in the writing portion that we sometimes found that we were starting to drift off and were not fully on topic. It is easy while writing an essay to find yourself way off topic and having paragraphs of nonsense in which you will then have to cut and basically start all over again.
The collaboration process has given me the time to work with others and see how my peers write. This has helped me somewhat improve my own papers by showing me ways that others answer the same questions. I feel that with the whole collaboration process I have become a better writer and the process has forced me to understand that my papers do not always flow well and do not always explain themselves the way I though they did while I was writing them. The idea of working with people who have a different sense of writing styles can help students think outside the box the next time the write a paper. It helps to allow students to experience a variety of ways to help explain their points in different ways instead of just writing the same repetitive papers.
Topic Sentences
Assignment 8 Reflection
In my English 101 class we were instructed to write an interpretive essay that addressed a question chosen from a list. This may not sound so difficult, which it was not. The question I addressed in my essay was; “What is the fine line between arguing on behalf of the truth and making truth up?” We were instructed to refer to and quote in detail three essays from our textbook, which applied to our topic.
Personally I thought this part of the assignment was fairly simple. I was able to find three essays that applied nicely to my topic, and was able to receive a lot of good information from them. A major point of my essay was that everyone looks at things differently, so something that may be true to one person may not be true to another. Everyone has a different upbringing and comes from a different background so we all look at things differently. In my essay I quoted from an essay in our text book called They have a Different Idea About That. I stated, “Each perspective in its own environment, or circumstance, will be true or valid-in that environment, in those circumstances. One statement that may be true in one person’s circumstance may be making up the truth in another circumstance.”
As stated earlier I felt that part of the assignment was no different than any other assignment. The more difficult part came when we were instructed to work on a collaborative essay with other students in the class. We were required to use each of our own individual essays together to address a broader question. We were then instructed to get into a group of two or three people and work on this collaborative essay together. For my group I only had one partner, which believe did make it slightly easier for us since we did not have a third question that had to be addressed within our essay.
My partner for the collaborative essay was Katie and the question which she was addressing was; “How might making truth up be a positive thing?” Our topics were fairly similar to one and other which I believe also made it slightly easier on us to form a collaborative essay around our two topics. A major point of her essay was that leaving out information is not necessarily lying. As well as if you are making up truth to help or protect someone it can be a positive thing. In her essay she states, “If someone thinks a different way than someone else, if they make the truth to get their point across I believe it is ok. In the end I think as long as you are doing it to help someone and you are not hurting anyone I believe it is a positive thing”
As a group we were instructed to write an introduction to our collaborative essay tying together each of our topics and addressing a larger question. Within our introduction we stated “There is a fine line between arguing on behalf of the truth and making the truth up, but when? In this situation it may even be acceptable to leave information out. How can making the truth up be a positive thing?”
I believe trying to combine our two essays into one that addressed both of our topics was the most difficult part of the assignment. Not only were we trying to make two completely different papers sound like one. We also had to work together on an introduction and conclusion to the paper. This is what caused most of the problems for us. As we stated in our essay everyone has a different way of looking at things and everyone has a different way going about their work. This is why it was such a challenge for us to complete our work as we each had a different idea about how it should sound.
Everyone has their own way they like to go about writing an essay, and their own particular word choice. Writing a paper with someone else can be a bit of a challenge sometimes, as one person thinks it should be written they way they normally do it. When the other person thinks that it might sound better written they way they like it.
Overall the assignment we were given in my English 101 class was challenging when we got to the end and to find some way to make our topics work in conjunction. I do believe it was a good experience for me, as I was able to receive feedback from one of my peers on my writing. I was also able to provide feedback to her as well, which I believe strengthened our essay in the end.
weekly blog
weekly blog
reflective essay
This assignment derived from my English 101 class. For this particular project we were instructed to organize groups containing three members. For my group I selected Katilin, and Becky to work with. We were then given a sheet of paper which contained a series of different ideas and questions of which we were to form a bigger question pertaining to three of those ideas/questions on the sheet. From the three base questions we were then each assigned one that we had to compose a four page paper, using three stories from our composition reader as references. After each individual paper was constructed we then had to combine the three separate papers into one large paper. Each of the essays’s had to collaborate to answer the big question for the final paper. Our main question that assembled, from the smaller questions, was “Do one’s own experiences and the history we read in textbooks influence the way we would solve a social demographic situation?” The three questions in which this question was created are as follows: What makes differences in social demographics (race, economic class, gender, nationality, ethnicity, etc) so difficult to resolve? What does memory have to do with making an argument? And what relationships do myths have with memory and history?
As a result of the three small questions getting divided amongst us, I was designated to write on the topic of “What does memory have to do with making an agreement?” So once I started to dissect and pick apart my question I had to determine what was the question really saying/asking; who would be reading my paper, and what details would be most fitting to put in. After I determined that my paper would directed towards readers not in my class; I decided to stay away from referencing the actual assignment in the essay. I also prepared it for a more mature audience by expanding my vocabulary, and including questions that would really make the reader think, such as “how can you base an agreement off a memory if memories can’t be held accountable for being truthful?”
The toughest part about composing my individual paper was trying to contemplate how to write it, and where to even start. I decided the easiest way would be to pick a side of the agreement and take it from there. My main choice of topic was that memories cannot be the only thing an argument is based off since memories are often altered. I then went on and explained how memories are often altered, what happens when a memory is altered, and how people tend to fabricate their memories in their minds, but believe that it’s the truth. The three sources that I received information from for references were: The Method of Memory, by Jonah Lehrer, My Father’s Brain, by Jonathan Franzen, and A Photograph Is Not an Opinion, Or is it? by Susan Songtag.
I set my paper up by first explaining my take on the topic, and then continuing onto why I thought this using the details from my resources. I made the paragraphs flow into each other by taking the topic of one and slightly altering it and forming it into another question which would then be a new paragraph. To grab and keep the reader’s attention and really make them think, I threw some questions in some of the paragraphs, with the intent that they would have to stop their reading and think for a minute about the question proposed. Even though we did have to use three resources, my topic was broad enough, and opinionated enough that I could take my own ideas and conform them into the same ideas of the writers from the composition reader, so most of the paper was indeed using my own ideas. While thinking about my own paper in its entirety, I also had to remember that my paper would be combined with the other two papers so I had to maintain a theme so that the papers would easily fit together.
When the time came to combine all three papers, we were then stuck with the predicament of how we would get these entirely different papers to conform into one. We wrote an introduction for the large new paper, that used the idea that myths are derived from memories, since information can be added to memories making them false and fabricated thus turning them into a myth, and from these memories which are turned into fabricated myths, social demographics are formed. We formed our introduction in a way that we felt best represented all of our papers as a whole. We started the introduction paper out using three questions that we pulled from each of our papers. We then took those questions and made three separate paragraphs giving a brief overview of what each paper would be about. Following those paragraphs we continued to write about how these papers tied together to form one, and answer our main topic question. Once the intro was done, we then just used title headings to transfer from paper to paper.
The most difficult part of writing the intro as a team was just that. We had to work as team, not individuals. Everyone has different writing styles, different vocabulary, and different ways to go about writing a paper. The hardest part about that for me was the fact that we would be stumped on how to go about writing a sentence and they would just want to skip it and come back, and for me I need everything to go in sequential order. Also I like to try to expand the vocabulary of a paper, but they didn’t agree on some of the words I suggested to use. It was also difficult because we all had such diverse schedules we had a rough time finding enough time to meet in a group making it very rushed to try and achieve a good paper.
Although it was a new experience writing in a group, which got a little stressful at times it was also very beneficial. I took away different ideas of how to go about writing a paper, like waiting until the end to turn the format to double space instead of doing it right at the beginning. I also gained new vocabulary from them, and different ways to proof read a paper. I learned that team work can make a project easier in the fact that you have other people’s opinions, and ideas to use, or give you ideas. It makes you look at a project in a new light, it brings more enjoyment out of it knowing you have teammates to support you and cheer you on.
Over all, this assignment turned out to be very educational. I learned how to go about writing an interpretive essay, how different people write papers, and most of all that team work really is the key to success. If we wouldn’t have collaborated together and made compromises here and there we would have never been able to compose a paper. So even though it got tough at times and I wanted to cry, it was all worth it for the sense and feeling of accomplishment.
Reflective Essay
English 101
The Difficult Process
Writing an essay is never easy work, having to write an essay collaboratively with two other idea driven girls is much more difficult. “The Explanation of Social Demographics” is the collaborative interpretive essay that Heather, Kaitlin and I cohesively wrote. We each had our own individual essays about somewhat similar topics and we needed to bring each of our essays together and make them into a cohesive essay. Writing an interpretive essay “Myths, Memories and History” was difficult to make the many choices. Then to have to hope that the choices one made would condense well with the other two in the group.
Each and every author approaches an essay from a different direction, some come at it head on, start from the beginning and end at the end. Others just write their ideas and elaborate and make the order more defined after they have completed the essay. The focus of an essay is really the defining aspect, without the purpose behind the essay there is no real determining factors. Looking back each decision that was made within both, the individual interpretive essay and the collaborative essay, from the purpose, and the context, all the way to the audience that is being targeted, are what drove the essay to its focus.
While writing the interpretive essay “Myths, Memories and History” there were many different directions to go to depict the relationship that memories and history shared with myths. Initially it was difficult to determine who was going to be the target audience for this essay. To completely understand and comprehend the connections that are being made in this essay the readers must be of a certain age. Above the age of 17 years would probably be best. Not that the essay is a difficult read but the contexts used could be considered confusing at points. The diction, context, purpose and connections that were used in this paper could have been the factors that made this essay more advanced and difficult to read. The collaborative essay was targeted to approximately to the same audience, generally my two group members and I had the same target audience.
As my interpretative essay was developing it was difficult to see how the contexts would connect the interpretation. In this essay specific word choice and concepts were utilized from other essays. The essays that were used were “The Gospel of Consumption and the better future we left behind” By Jeffrey Kaplan, “Marcel Proust: The Method of Memory” by Lerher, and “The Future of the American Frontier” by John Timran. Theses essay were chosen to be featured in the interpretative essay because they all had topics which correspond to the topics that were being used in “Myths, Memories and History”. “The Gospel of Consumption and the better future we left behind” discussed facts and history which was easily tied into the history portion of the interpretive essay. Also Kaplan’s essay used descriptive words which were perfect to describe the relationships that myths shared with history and memories. For example “conjured” and “reviving” were some of the words that allowed many connections to be made. “Marcel Proust: The Method of Memory” obviously focused on memories, this essay not only helped develop a basic knowledge on memories but also gave a different look at exactly how myths and memories are connected. This essay created some thought provoking concerns and ideas, “One could say that Marcel Proust had a myth on his hands, a concept which he conjured up about the origin of memories that he was attempting to prove to a disbelieving public.” Finally “The Future of the American Frontier” gave an example that coincided with the interpretative essay perfectly. While attempting to prove to connection of history and myths Timran’s essay was easily explained in “Myths, Memories and History”, “This myth is all about the outlook on the future of America. The “Frontier” the horizon where everything is better, this is a myth because no one person knows the future of a country or the world so to assure and promise to anyone that everything will be fine is pretty much impossible.” The context of “Myths, Memories and History” is what made it interpretive, utilizing outside sources to develop the argument of the relationships between myths, memories and history.
In the collaborative essay used the context of each of our own essays. We each had a quote from ourselves that help support our argument, by utilizing our own work I feel it helped us to become more involved to our topic. For example “Everyone has different memories of different situations, some good and some bad, and in situations people tend base their view of something off that one memory.” (As quoted by Heather in her essay, "Memories") I believe that by utilizing our own interpretative essays which have already been affected by other authors we included some of the most in-depth though provoking ideas into the collaboration.
The purpose of “Myths, Memories and History” is to compare the relationships of memories to myths and history to myths. These relationships are quite important to the outlook of the world. Memories are difficult to distinguish between false and true, they can diminish over time and can become hazy and difficult to remember. This being the problem with memories is what causes the relationship with myths, my being unable to recall every aspect of a scenario each memory become very unreliable. These unreliable thoughts and stories will suddenly be turned into myths “Myths are hard to define; they are invented stories, ideas, or concepts. Myths are typically a traditional or legendary story, with or without any proof of fact or a natural explanation.” As stated in “Myths, Memories and History”. History is typically considered to be fact and of course true because that is what the majority of the population believes, by having theses loop holes in history there is room for myths. Myths in history are usually just another view of an event, but also myths can make history what it is, as discovered in “The Explanation of Social Demographics” “Without these myths, facts couldn't be considered true because one would have nothing to compare them to.” This is displaying the connection of history and myths, and the way they depend on each other for their credibility or lack thereof. Within the interpretive essay “Myths, Memories and History” the intent was to carry the purpose throughout the essay. Dividing the paper into sections of introduction, memory verses myths; history verses myths, and then concluding with myths and a restated purpose. The layout and elaborating that was included in the interpretative essay was intended to clarify the intent and purpose.
Within our collaborative essay we wanted to have a cumulative larger thesis question to tie our entire individual essay together. A question that could and would be answered by reading each of our essays, from the essay ‘The Explanation of Social Demographics” our thesis question “Therefore, is it fair to say that one's own experiences and the history we read in textbooks influence the way we would solve a demographic situation?” This statement is what lead to our purpose to give knowledge to the reader to answer this question.
While I was writing this interpretative essay I attempted to take the less popularized side to each argument I made. The main idea I kept returning to was to make the connections clear, using my own words and my own interpretations of the sources I used and the questions I answered. For example in “Myths, Memories and History” I stated “Each one of these so called historical “facts” that everyone assumes is the truth could really just be yet another myth that someone tells you to make everything seem to be O.K.” by giving my audience something to think about that in the end the will hopefully come to a conclusion about. I struggled always having to keep my group members in mind as I wrote and I feel it went quite well. The many hurtles my group and I were forced to overcome will in the long run help us to become much better authors.
The collaborative essay “The Explanation of Social Demographics” which I wrote collectively with two other classmates was an elaboration and connection of all of our personal interpretive essays. We each had a question that we were to interpretative, in this collaborative essay we used all of our ideas and research to come together and give reason to the questions we were trying to answer. Some of the difficulties that my group had was our combination of layout, while we each wrote our essay the way we normally do weather that be traditional or not, bringing everything together was difficult due to the fact that we all too different views on essay writing. Also each group member came with their own idea of what is the most important aspect of an essay. I feel that the content and diction are the most important aspects to an essay they give the information and create an easy to read intelligent essay. Whereas it seemed to be that the rest of my group felt layout and sentence structure should have been taken into top consideration. It was a difficult process to work through having many ideas being discussed it was hard to keep track. Many times it took much convincing and possibly some majority rules to make a decision, but I believe along with my group members that we, in the end, had an informative combination of ideas which is “The Explanation of Social Demographics”.
Weekly Blog #11
Weekly Blog #10
Weekly Blog #9
Topic Sentences
Friday, November 13, 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2009
First Sentences
First sentence
First Sentences
First Sentance
first sentence
first sentences
After reviewing all of my topic sentences on a different sheet of paper, I realized they all need a lot of work. First of all, I start three of the topic sentences in the same way by saying what the title of the article I read was. I could have started the paragraphs with a quote or something different to make my paper more interesting. In other words, I directly stated what I was going to talk about from paragraph to paragraph. Also, my topic sentences don’t relate too much to the question I’m trying to answer. By making them go with the question will further help me answer the question in as much detail as possible. All in all, I need to work on making my topic sentences go back to my thesis and having different structures for each topic sentence to avoid repetition.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
First Sentences
First Sentences of my Essay-
Friday, October 30, 2009
Articles
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Articles
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Distinctions
weekly blog
Friday, October 23, 2009
Thursday, October 22, 2009
interpretations
Distinctions
Distinction
Differences
Johanna also mentions the emphasis on letters she references a essay in which “Each page was headed by a letter of the alphabet located in a word which spoke the letter’s name.” In Carr’s easy he used larger sized font and bold lettering to distinguish his thoughts throughout the essay. He also used his title and first paragraph to his advantage by utilizing his fonts and also by using a quote from Space Odyssey.
Many of the examples and explanations through the essay “Letterpress Language: Typography as a Medium for The Visual Representation of Language” were about differentiation between important, less important, well known, unknown, thoughtful, thoughtless, and many other words and terms incorporated in an article. In Carr’s essay he would use smaller fonts, upper case letters, pictures, quotes, and colors to help differentiate his meaning behind the words he chose.
Distinctions
distinctions
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
I guess first our group came up with the similarities and the most obvious one is that they're both about technology. Both of the articles talks about information and what it is doing to our habits. The Google article is talking about how Google is negatively effecting our brain and the Technologies essay is talking about how graphic designing programs can help us come up with new and interesting ways to write a paper, forcing us to think about what we are writing a bit more. We also said that another major difference is that the Google article had a much more negative tone and the Technologies article had a much more positive one.
After saying all that I would have to say that question didn't change how I reader either article or effect my comprehention of it. It didn't do either because I didn't know what my assignment was when I was reading through both of the articles. However, when we where assigned that question I did have to look back through both to get more points to talk about. I would also have to say the the way the Technologies article was written might have effected how well I read the article because of the formating some of the sentenses seemed cut off and choppy. The Google article I might had read a bit differently because I'm tired of reading articles written telling us that technology is bad and making us stupid.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Some of the factors that we chose were in the essay itself. For instance, the fact that the writing was so small and close together made the essay appear intimidating. Therefore make those who read it want to just skim it, instead of making sure that they understand it. Then there was one picture that was kind of distracting. Then some of the other factors had to do with the way the essay was presented to us. For example, when it was given to the class we did not even have a clue what it was going to be about. Then we were only given ten minutes to read it, thus making us just want to skim through it. However, on the positive side the classroom environment being quiet made it much easier to pay attention to the essay, because ther were no distractions.
Overall I did not finish reading the essay in class. These examples were some of the obstacles I had to pass to read it or some of the things that made it easier for me to concentrate. These are things to look for to either prevent or help when the students are reading essays.
group 2
One of the things that Nicholas Carr gave to his essay to capture the reader was that he created a unique title, that drew attention and gave the reader the question, “um, I wonder that this is about?” which made them read on. Another thing that Nicholas Carr did with the essay was that he quoted from the movie Space Odyssey 2001 which gave the reader a familiar feeling and comfortable about maybe what the material is about. This gave the reader even more reason to read on.
As a reader would follow on in the essay they see that there is not only very good research, but also very good visual aid. He gave a picture which gave a visual picture in the readers mind to see what the author is talking about, and help understand his topic. Later on I saw also that he would use big letters to start off a new part of the topic in the essay. This is very good because it lets the reader know that they have completed a thought of the essay and it helps them connect it to the next part. It can also be seen as a check point in the writing, showing that they have gotten such far and has such and such more to go, before all date is collected.
Other comparisons between the two is that although Carr's essay is very long it still has a very simple structure of intro body and conclusion. Another main mechanical difference is how both the class and Carr rely text to various parts of the essay to give example and other evidence.
group1
Materially, in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr went into great detail about how technology, in specific the internet, has changed the thought process for many people today. With advances in technology, people are having a shorter attention span. The author incorporated a lot of outside research that went into creating this passage. This differs from the essays written in class in that we have been writing from personal experience and have not researched information to support our writing. When a writer incorporates resources, statistics, and facts in their writing it supports the main topic and conveys that the author has a valid point. Another way to do so is to offer different points of view for the reader to consider. Where the author of this passage showed different facts that represented each take on the issue, our essays in class tend to be focused on one view. The point of view, in which our essays have been writing in, is through the author’s eyes or first person.
Technologically, the essays in English 101 have been basic essays with a set amount of paragraphs. In the article by Carr, he added interest to the reading by incorporating pictures and large quotes. When adding pictures and quotes it should convey an important detail about the paper. The essays have also been significantly shorter than the passage. This does not necessarily make the passage better but it does convey that the author has a lot of detail and can fully support their topic. One way to lengthen the essays written in class would be to add more detail about each event that occurred. This would depict a specific picture in the audience’s mind while reading.
Group 1
Group 3
i must say that reading the article in class didn`t really change my interpretation of the article. either way the article(s) still read the same. they weren`t hard to comprehend at all. it could possibly be because i`m missing an important concept or something. i`m not sure.
since the "what is the internet doing to our brains?" article was more interestingly put and written, i was more able to read it. i liked it more. not saying that the other article was boring, but the "what is the..." was more creative with how it was explained.
Group 2
Group 4
Secondly, the font for me was very small so it was hard for me to read it quickly without having to take a second glance to make sure i read it right the first time. With a bigger text it would have been a much easier read than with the text that was used on this essay.
Lastly, there was a picture right in the beginning of the essay so right away I was distracted by looking at the picture focusing more on that than the essay. Sometimes I doodle on the picture which takes time away from me reading the essay. This is bad because we were timed and because I took time to color I had to skim to catch up to where I should have been if I was not doodling. If that picture would not have been there I maybe would have understood the essay better because I would not have skimmed the essay.
group 1
Technologically Carr uses a lot of information and stories from other writers to back up his article and provide other point of views to the topic. He starts many of his thoughts or paragraphs with a quote or citation from another piece of work to get his idea rolling. He describes many situations comparing the way we interacted and thought before and after the arrival of the internet, which entices the reader and makes them become very involved in the topic.
It is obvious that Nicholas Carr did a lot of research for this article, to include the amount of information which he did. While the topics of the papers we had to do this semester were nothing like the internet’s effect on our brain, it is still safe to say that Carr’s included a lot more information and different materials than we would have to. He also goes into greater detail to entice the reader and make them interested in the topic.